refactor(providers): depend only on qbit-assistant-provider-api (#9) #12

Merged
KofTwentyTwo merged 2 commits from feature/arch-provider-api into develop 2026-10-14 13:27:25 +00:00
2 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
james.maesandClaude Opus 5.5 e790a1091f Merge origin/develop into feature/arch-provider-api
Brings in the qbit-email transport (#11). Conflicts are resolved in
favour of the RC.6/provider-api side, keeping qbit-email.

qbit-email is a new cross-qbit implementation dependency that the
enforced G1 guardrail rejects. It is allow-listed explicitly and
temporarily until qbit-email publishes an API (#13).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-14 08:18:27 -05:00
james.maesandClaude Opus 5.5 3ec8776c2a refactor(providers): depend only on qbit-assistant-provider-api and provider-openai
Marketing compiled against qbit-assistant internals, and installing it
pulled in the whole assistant runtime. It now depends on
qbit-assistant-provider-api (the provider SPI and ModelPricing) and on the
published qbit-assistant-provider-openai, both 0.1.0-RC.11. The local
OpenAiCompatibleModelProvider is gone, and tests use a local scripted
double, so the full assistant is not needed even in test scope.

Hosts register the published provider through ProviderSettings. Its
provider name is "openai-compatible", so Marketing Policy provider
overrides must use that name.

Also move to QQQ 4.1.0-RC.6 and qbit-build-parent 2.1.0 with the
guardrails enforced. The provider-api packages and provider-openai are
explicitly allow-listed.

Closes #9 (architecture review QRun-IO/qqq#1150, finding F5).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-14 08:00:04 -05:00